Back to updates

Education

HFpEF in 2026: diagnose the syndrome, search for mimics, treat the whole phenotype

A 2026 ACC expert pathway frames HFpEF as a multisystem syndrome: diagnose thoughtfully, look for cardiac and noncardiac mimics, and address comorbidities alongside evidence-based therapy.

Prepared by
Iraq Cardiology Editorial Team
Source authors
Kittleson MM, Panjrath GS, Bates K, et al.
Last reviewed
August 23, 2026
Reading time
6 min

Quick summary

The essential point, in one sentence.

Reading companion

A professional question, bounded to this record.

Answers use this update and its recorded sources only; it does not provide individual treatment advice.

The practical shift

The 2026 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway presents HFpEF as more than a preserved ejection fraction. It emphasizes a careful assessment of symptoms, congestion, structural or functional cardiac abnormalities, and the wider clinical context.

Start with diagnosis, not an assumption

Dyspnoea and oedema can reflect HFpEF, but they can also arise from pulmonary disease, kidney disease, obesity, frailty, valvular or infiltrative heart disease, pericardial disease, or other conditions. The pathway highlights the need to search for cardiac and noncardiac mimics rather than treating a preserved ejection fraction as a final answer.

Scores support judgement

H₂FPEF, HFA-PEFF, and HFpEF-ABA may support diagnostic evaluation, but none replaces pre-test probability, imaging, biomarkers, differential diagnosis, or clinical judgement. The intermediate range remains a signal to investigate further.

Treat the phenotype, not a label

The pathway links optimal care to comorbidity management, nonpharmacologic care, and evidence-based therapies where appropriate. Its focus is multidisciplinary and ambulatory, while recognizing that individual choices depend on clinical context and patient priorities.

Source

2026 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of HFpEF.

Professional discussion starter

Turn reading into a balanced conversation.

Prompts for professional reflection—not individual treatment advice.

  1. 1Which element of the source most changes how your team would frame Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
  2. 2Which limitation or context should be made explicit before discussing application?
  3. 3What question is worth taking to a journal club or multidisciplinary meeting?

Continue reading

Related updates